The long off-season of analysis, speculation and off-ice
drama is beyond us – finally, the NHL is back. Here’s my third and final
instalment of storylines to watch as we venture into a new season.
How good will Toronto
be?
Although Mike Babcock is being cast as a saviour in Toronto,
the fact of the matter is that the Leafs list is still terrible. It’s going to
take Babcock a year or three to get the ship righted and pointed in the right
direction. Season 2015-16 is definitely going to be a work in progress, and
most Leafs fans likely know that. As good as Babcock is, he isn’t a miracle
worker, and has quite a project ahead of him. Of course, when he gets things
going at the Air Canada Centre, watch out.
Now, if only Babcock could do something about the lifeless
atmosphere that exists in the Leafs’ barn.
Will Dallas finally
live up to the hype?
This might be the year the Stars match their prodigious
scoring ability with an ability to play proper, NHL-level defence. Last year
was a case of the defence giving up more goals than Tyler Seguin and company
could score – and that’s saying something, because, offensively, the Stars were
white hot – but this year, GM Jim Nill has made a few solid moves to strengthen
their back-end, bringing in guys like Johnny Odouya from Chicago and Antti
Niemi to help out Kari Lehtonen in goal. Alex Goligoski and Jason Demers also
head into Big D looking to stabilise a very unstable defence. It’s exactly what
the doctor ordered.
A year after acquiring Jason Spezza in a big trade, the
Stars netted Patrick Sharp from Chicago, and there’s plenty more offensive
talent, including Jamie Benn and promising Russian rookie Valeri Nichushkin,
who missed most of last year with hip surgery. He looks like blossoming in the
high-octane Stars offense.
Based on the moves made down in Texas, the only way is up
for the Stars, and I have them down as serious contenders in a brutal Central
Division that should be very Intriguing.
What about the
Islanders?
The Isles left their long-time, and dilapidated home at the
Nassau County Memorial Coliseum – or the mausoleum, as Rangers fans like to
call it – in favour of the sleek Barclay’s Centre in Brooklyn, and that shift signals
a real change in the franchise’s fortune.
Gone is most of the off-ice dysfunctionality that has marred
them for so long, and it will likely mean a sustained run of success, with the
likes of franchise stars Jonathan Tavares and Ryan Strome spearheading that run,
with secondary scoring from the likes of Matt Martin, Kyle Okposo and Brock
Nelson.
Second-year Islanders Nick Leddy and Johnny Boychuk figure
to have a bigger impact on defence, and, after years of goal-tending mediocrity
– remember Rick Di Pietro? – there seems to be stability in the form of Jaroslav
Halak.
No doubt, the Isles tired down the stretch last year after
spending a large chunk of the season atop the tightly-contested Metropolitan
Division, but they’ll be better for the experience this time around. Travis
Hamonic is another underrated defenceman in the NHL, but I love what he does.
The blue-liners of the Islanders have plenty of grit to go with their skill.
Learning beside the great Zdeno Chara in Boston, Boychuk’s never taken a
backward step to anyone, and Hamonic is from a similar mould.
As a Rangers fan, it pains me to say, but the Islanders will
be a force in the Metro division this year.
The Coach’s Challenge
– will it work?
If you judge success by review systems in the NFL, then yes,
the new challenge ability will be well received by all and sundry across the
league. Hockey is a game, where everything happens quickly and in close
quarters. I’m sure you can recall circumstances where on-ice calls aren’t
backed up by ensuing video footage, because I certainly can. Sometimes, those
circumstances have decided playoff series’ or delivered massive momentum
swings.
Now, NHL bench bosses have the ability to challenge contentious or
downright wrong calls, which can only be a good thing for the overall
credibility of the league.
No one likes to see games and/or series’ come down to a bad
call – and, at the speed the game is played these days, you can’t blame the
on-ice officials; they can only do their best in a trying situation – and the
challenge system should eliminate that.
Will the 2016 World
Cup of Hockey be a success?
Probably, but it won’t match the Olympics. It’s easy to see
why the NHL is pushing this international concept: they want a slice of the
monetary pie, which they don’t get from sending their players to the Olympics
every four years.
Whilst the NHL continues to deny that they may still allow
their players to go to the Olympics, it seems increasingly likely that the
League wants this to be a replacement tournament. That’s okay, I guess, if your
country actually has a team accepted to the tournament – like the United States,
Canada, Sweden, Finland, the Czech Republic and Russia – because it’ll be
similar to an Olympic tournament, just one held in Toronto’s Air Canada Centre.
But what about those forced to play on a Team Europe
all-star outfit made up of players not from the European nations represented? It’s
not even close to being the same, and the Team Europe concept cheapens the
entire tournament. That said, the Team North America under-23 squad is an
intriguing one. That could be a loaded outfit!
I’ll be watching the World Cup closely, of course, but I
can’t see it matching, say, the passion and drama of the 2010 Vancouver Olympic
tournament.
Enjoy the season, everyone!
No comments:
Post a Comment