Not sure
why I didn’t enjoy this book. I love history, and one of the eras I find most
interesting is Australia in the late 1800s through World War One and into the
Roaring Twenties.
So much of our country’s heritage had it’s beginning in those
rough days before Federation, including the Kelly Gang – Ned Kelly, Steve Hart,
Joe Byrne and Ned’s younger brother Dan – whose exploits seemed to grip the
nation until the gang’s demise at the Siege of Glenrowan in rural Victoria, and
Kelly’s subsequent death by hanging, are, for better or worse, always going to
be an important part of our country’s history.
This was
the first Peter FitzSimons book I’ve read. My dad’s read most of what the rugby
player turned journalist has released, and I’ve got Tobruk and Kokoda on my
eReader, ready to delve into later. From the way a lot of people, my old man
included, rave about FitzSimons’ work, I was expecting a whole lot more than
what I got.
I have a
rule for reading: I won’t abandon a title until I’ve read at least a hundred pages.
Some books – particularly long ones, like Tom Clancy’s work – really don’t get
going before the century page mark is reached. For me, Ned Kelly never really
got going at all. I found myself forever bogged down. It didn’t hold my
attention really well at all – not even during the climactic siege. I didn’t
like the chopping and changing of points-of-view, either.
Maybe it
was information overload. The book’s title is Ned Kelly, but there’s so much
about police officers, some who are very minor functionaries, and others with
only minimal involvement that the Kelly gang are sometimes relegated to being a
forgotten group of antagonists. It’s information overload. So much minute
detail that I could really have done without.
Somewhat
frustratingly, FitzSimons has written a lot of the book using the same manner
of speaking as was used during the time the Kelly gang were at their
best/worst. I found it increasingly annoying as I got deeper in.
All of that
said, I won’t give up on FitzSimons yet. Even the greatest authors in history
write a bad book – or, at least one not as good as the others – every now and
again. All those people, like my dad, who love his translation of history can’t
be completely wrong. I’ll read Kokoda with
an open mind and hope that it catapults me into the Peter FitzSimons Fan Club.
I concur on all levels. Found the detail too dense with words and lacking narrative "drive".
ReplyDeleteMy overall response is unnervingly similar to that of "Kitch"and am at the point of trying to decide whether to continue or not.
I have read Kokoda and other of Fitzie's books without such dilemmas
I understand that Fitz said commented on how the book was not supposed to lean towards one side or the other, regarding what side of justice Ned Kelly fell apon. But were you able to recognise any sort of bias or comments throughout the novel, that made you think that Peter Fitz had his own particular oppinion about it?
ReplyDelete